Everyone has a different percentage complete
On a utility site the schedule lives in one tool, the material issue register in another, and the subcontractor’s claim in a third. The three never agree, and the argument happens at month end.
4 sources of truth on progress
Planning, site, procurement and the client each measuring something slightly different.
9% material variance
Issued quantity against installed quantity, discovered late, absorbed as cost.
18 days to settle a progress claim
Because the evidence behind the claim has to be assembled after the fact.
Installed quantity is an estimate
A supervisor’s figure at the end of the day, with the photos to prove it taken later, if at all.
Subcontractor payouts negotiated, not measured
Without verified quantity per package, every invoice becomes a conversation.
Risk surfaces at the monthly review
A block that fell behind in week two is discovered when the client’s report is due.
Packages, evidence, reconciliation, claim
Break the scope into work packages
Blocks, rows, trackers and civil scopes become packages with quantities, rates and a responsible subcontractor.
Powered byReDesk AI ›
Material issued against the package
Every module, tracker and cable drum is issued to a package and scanned on receipt, so variance is visible daily instead of quarterly.
Powered byReCart Buyer ›
Progress measured on site, with proof
Crews and QA record installed quantity against the package with geotagged evidence, so percentage complete is measured, not estimated.
Powered byRePartner ›
The claim assembles itself
A progress claim is generated from verified quantities with the evidence attached — which is why it stops being negotiated.
Powered byRePrime ›
Four products, one work-breakdown structure
The package is the unit of everything: scope, material, progress, payment. That single choice removes most month-end reconciliation.
